Table 4 Results of logistic regression analyses.
From: Hepatitis A and hepatitis B infection risk among employees at schools for disabled pupils
HAV vaccinationa N = 1.374 | HBV vaccinationb N = 1.380 | |
|---|---|---|
aOR (95% CI) | aOR (95% CI) | |
Age | 0.98 (0.964; 0.986) | 0.97(0.962; 0.985) |
SE/IF vs. reference group M/P | 0.55 (0.411; 0.748) | 0.58 (0.425; 0.785) |
Professional group TS vs. reference group ES | 0.96 (0.737; 1.250) | 1.0 (0.76; 1.324) |
Men vs. reference group women | 0.77 (0.566; 1.054) | 0.63 (0.461; 0.867) |
No participation in vaccination counselling vs. reference group Participation in vaccination counselling | 0.36 (0.276; 0.458) | 0.43 (0.331; 0.551) |
No offer of infection prevention instruction every 2 years vs. reference group 2-year offer of infection prevention instruction | 0.83 (0.613; 1.136) | 0.81 (0.582; 1.123) |
No Participation in infection prevention training vs. reference group | 0.74 (0.539; 1.002) | 0.54 (0.389; 0.750) |
Support for toilet visits/intimate care vs. reference group | 0.69 (0.413; 1.151) | 0.57 (0.344; 0.957) |
Diapers of pupils vs. reference group | 1.40 (0.885; 2.219) | 0.93 (0.582; 1.476) |
Support with food intake vs. reference group | 0.80 (0.523; 1.214) | 0.98 (0.633; 1.509) |
Support with medication vs. reference group | 0.92 (0.671; 1.255) | 0.80 (0.581; 1.103) |
Catheterisation of pupils vs. reference group | 0.94 (0.561; 1.586) | .82 (0.471; 1.445) |
Probing of pupils vs. reference group | 0.91 (0.662; 1.256) | 1.08 (0.769; 1.509) |
Being scratched. bitten or spat at by pupils vs. reference group | 0.86 (0.594; 1.252) | 1.18 (0.800; 1.735) |
Nagelkerke R2 | 0.18 | 0.20 |
