Table 4 Differences in clinical features between defined groups of untreated PDR patients.

From: Vitreous protein networks around ANG2 and VEGF in proliferative diabetic retinopathy and the differential effects of aflibercept versus bevacizumab pre-treatment

Variable

Contrast

Protein

Median protein levels (pg/ml)

P value

Group 1

Group 2

Group 3

Primary indication for vitrectomy

VH versus VMT/TRD

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā 

IGFBP1

2815

681

Ā 

0.009

Ā 

PDGF-BB

0.361

0.000

Ā 

0.007

Neovascularisation activity

0 + 1 versus 2

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā 

VEGF-ELISA

465

3010

Ā 

 < 0.001

Ā 

VEGFA

5250

29,006

Ā 

 < 0.001

Ā 

PlGF-ELISA

43.51

219.71

Ā 

 < 0.001

Ā 

PlGF

190

855

Ā 

 < 0.001

Ā 

MCP-1

3770

4403

Ā 

0.003

Degree of haemorrhage

0 + 1 versus 2 + 3

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā 

CTGF-ELISA

255,755

521,370

Ā 

0.003

Ā 

IGFBP3-ELISA

6293

8121

Ā 

0.005

Ā 

HGF

490

754

Ā 

0.001

Ā 

MCP-1

3494

4276

Ā 

0.002

Ā 

MMP-9

28.86

51.81

Ā 

0.005

Ā 

PDGF-BB

0.000

0.514

Ā 

 < 0.001

0 + 1 versus 2 + 3

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā 

MMP-9

23.63

64.99

Ā 

 < 0.001

Diabetes type

Type 1 versus 2

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā 

MCP-1

3494

4182

Ā 

0.003

Ā 

PlGF

189

531

Ā 

0.004

Ā 

VEGFA

4540

20,936

Ā 

0.004

Ā 

GDF-15

5213

6944

Ā 

0.002

New vessel location

0 + 1 versus 2 versus 3 + 4

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 
Ā 

ANGPT1

3.50

9.03

13.50

0.001

  1. The null hypothesis that all medians are equal was analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. P values represent the significance of differences between group medians. Significant differences (P < 0.01) are given. Variables are defined in Table 1.
  2. VH Vitreal haemorrhage, VMT Vitreo-macular traction, TRD Traction retinal detachment.