Table 3 Correlation analysis, whole-body EIM versus physical activity.

From: Diminished muscle integrity in patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva assessed with at-home electrical impedance myography

Parameter

Body part

FOP (N = 15)

Healthy controls (N = 13)

Phase (θ) 50 kHz

Whole body

r = 0.64, p = 0.010

r = 0.61, p = 0.028

Phase (θ) 100 kHz

Whole body

r = 0.68, p = 0.0050

r = 0.55, p = 0.051

Reactance (X) 50 kHz

Whole body

r = 0.61, p = 0.016

r = 0.21, p = 0.49

Reactance (X) 100 kHz

Whole body

r = 0.63, p = 0.011

r = 0.40, p = 0.18

Resistance (R) 50 kHz

Whole body

r =  − 0.53, p = 0.041

r =  − 0.59, p = 0.035

Resistance (R) 50 kHz

Whole body

r =  − 0.56, p = 0.030

r =  − 0.58, p = 0.036

  1. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) and two-tailed p-values are reported.