Table 1 Validation circuits.
Case study$ | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Circuit I | Circuit II | Circuit III | |
Substrate | RO4003 (εr = 3.38, h = 0.76 mm) | AD300 (εr = 2.97, h = 0.76 mm) | RO4003 (εr = 3.5, h = 0.51 mm) |
Design parameters | x = [l1 l2 l3 d w w1]T | x = [g l1r la lb w1 w2r w3r w4r wa wb]T | x = [Ls Ws l3r w1 w2 w3 w4 w5 wv]T |
High-fidelity model# | ~ 115,000 mesh cells; simulation time 350 s | ~ 85,000 mesh cells; simulation time 90 s | ~ 120,000 mesh cells; simulation time 150 s |
Low-fidelity model# | ~ 48,000 mesh cells; simulation time 125 s | ~ 27,000 mesh cells; simulation time 33 s | ~ 61,000 mesh cells; simulation time 68 s |
Other parameters | d1 = d +|w − w1|, d = 1.0, w0 = 1.7, and l0 = 15 | L = 2dL + Ls, Ls = 4w1 + 4 g + s + la + lb, W = 2dL + Ws, Ws = 4w1 + 4 g + s + 2wa, l1 = lbl1r, w2 = waw2r, w3 = w3rwa, w4 = w4rwa | dL = dW = 10 mm, L = 2dL + Ls, W = 2dW + 2w1 + (Ws − 2wf), l1 = Ws/2, l2 = l321/2, l3 = l3r((Ls − w3)/2 − w4/21/2), lv1 = l3/3, lv3 = Ls/2 − w3/2 − l3 + lv1; wf = 1.15 mm |
Operating bands | 0.89–1.11 GHz | 1.45–1.55 GHz | 2.36–2.44 GHz 5.16–5.24 GHz |
Maximum power split error | 0.4 dB at 1 GHz | 0.5 dB at 1.5 GHz | 0.5 dB at 2.4 GHz 0.5 dB at 5.2 GHz |
Nominal design | x(0) = [4.50 11.08 21.81 0.65 0.94 0.86]T | x(0) = [0.63 5.90 9.34 12.45 1.29 2.02 0.99 0.32 2.81 0.22]T | x(0) = [25.05 0.85 0.76 1.90 1.23 0.36 0.71 0.30 0.30]T |