Table 1 Y-rate-distortion performance of the proposed method compared with four state-of-the-art methods.
From: Geometry-aware view reconstruction network for light field image compression
LF images | Proposed vs. LSM19 | Proposed vs. PSC18 | Proposed vs. MuLE12 | Proposed vs. GCCM21 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BD-PSNR (dB) | BD-rate (%) | BD-PSNR (dB) | BD-rate (%) | BD-PSNR (dB) | BD-rate (%) | BD-PSNR (dB) | BD-rate (%) | |
I 01 | 0.96 | − 27.22 | 0.49 | − 10.30 | 1.63 | − 39.75 | 0.50 | − 14.53 |
I 02 | 1.43 | − 34.66 | 0.03 | − 6.31 | 0.46 | − 10.11 | 0.24 | − 5.99 |
I 03 | 0.73 | − 21.24 | 0.02 | − 2.20 | 0.84 | − 22.99 | 0.17 | − 4.95 |
I 04 | 0.78 | − 27.18 | 0.04 | − 10.93 | 0.39 | − 14.53 | 0.27 | − 10.92 |
I 05 | 1.02 | − 29.81 | 0.12 | − 5.46 | 2.43 | − 49.90 | 0.76 | − 17.77 |
I 06 | 1.08 | − 36.36 | 0.36 | − 28.55 | 1.81 | − 34.31 | 0.25 | − 26.91 |
I 07 | 0.87 | − 28.96 | 0.74 | − 8.96 | 2.75 | − 54.28 | 0.46 | − 15.06 |
I 08 | 0.66 | − 31.48 | 0.29 | − 33.69 | 3.00 | − 47.90 | 0.11 | − 22.16 |
I 09 | 1.05 | − 31.59 | 0.11 | − 5.32 | 2.77 | − 58.42 | 0.74 | − 23.00 |
I 10 | 0.74 | − 24.09 | 0.25 | − 5.32 | 1.75 | − 35.50 | 0.04 | − 1.50 |
Average | 0.93 | − 29.26 | 0.25 | − 11.70 | 1.78 | − 36.77 | 0.35 | − 14.28 |