Table 2 The results of proposed framework presented in terms of the area under the receiving operator curve and sensitivity against patients under inpatient and outpatient care.

0.81 [0.74–0.89]

0.90 [0.78–0.96]

0.87 [0.84–0.90]

0.98 [0.96–0.99]

0.66 [0.64–0.68]

0.81 [0.78–0.84]

0.69 [0.68–0.71]

0.89 [0.88–0.91]

0.69 [0.35–0.99]

0.67 [0.21–0.94]

0.89 [0.74–0.99]

1.00 [0.65–1.00]

0.65 [0.62–0.67]

0.81 [0.78–0.84]

0.68 [0.66–0.70]

0.89 [0.88–0.91]

0.76 [0.74–0.79]

1.00 [0.99–0.99]

0.74 [0.72–0.76]

1.00 [0.99–1.00]

0.86 [0.72–0.99]

1.00 [0.76–1.00]

0.83 [0.77–0.90]

0.98 [0.90–1.00]

0.80 [0.59–0.99]

1.00 [0.61–1.00]

0.89 [0.85–0.93]

0.98 [0.92–0.99]

0.78 [0.75–0.81]

0.88 [0.85–0.91]

0.90 [0.88–0.91]

0.98 [0.97–0.99]

0.77 [0.64–0.90]

0.88 [0.66–0.97]

0.77 [0.71–0.82]

0.93 [0.86–0.97]

0.65 [0.62–0.69]

0.82 [0.77–0.86]

0.66 [0.63–0.69]

0.86 [0.82–0.89]

0.55 [0.37–0.74]

0.70 [0.40–0.89]

0.55 [0.39–0.71]

0.85 [0.58–0.96]

0.64 [0.61–0.66]

0.81 [0.78–0.85]

0.66 [0.65–0.68]

0.89 [0.87–0.90]

0.67 [0.47–0.86]

0.78 [0.45–0.94]

0.59 [0.49–0.69]

0.85 [0.69–0.94]

0.67 [0.45–0.89]

0.71 [0.36–0.92]

0.82 [0.73–0.91]

0.97 [0.84–0.99]

0.65 [0.60–0.71]

0.83 [0.74–0.89]

0.63 [0.57–0.70]

0.86 [0.77–0.92]

0.79 [0.65–0.93]

1.00 [0.80–1.00]

0.73 [0.66–0.80]

0.92 [0.83–0.97]

0.67 [0.57–0.78]

0.81 [0.65–0.91]

0.69 [0.62–0.76]

0.93 [0.85–0.97]