Table 3 The results of proposed framework presented in terms of the area under the receiving operator curve and sensitivity against patients with and without sings of lung aging marked by the attending radiologists.

0.88 [0.85–0.90]

0.96 [0.93–0.98]

0.82 [0.77–0.87]

0.98 [0.94–1.00]

0.71 [0.69–0.72]

0.85 [0.83–0.87]

0.54 [0.51–0.58]

0.89 [0.87–0.90]

0.80 [0.62–0.99]

0.88 [0.53–0.98]

0.96 [0.76–1.00]

1.00 [0.34–1.00]

0.69 [0.67–0.71]

0.84 [0.82–0.87]

0.54 [0.50–0.57]

0.89 [0.87–0.91]

0.78 [0.76–0.80]

1.00 [1.00–1.00]

0.60 [0.57–0.64]

1.00 [1.00–1.00]

0.87 [0.80–0.94]

0.98 [0.87–1.00]

0.74 [0.62–0.85]

1.00 [0.86–1.00]

0.90 [0.85–0.94]

0.98 [0.92–0.99]

0.90 [0.78–1.00]

1.00 [0.70–1.00]

0.84 [0.82–0.86]

0.94 [0.92–0.96]

0.79 [0.74–0.84]

0.96 [0.92–0.98]

0.79 [0.73–0.84]

0.91 [0.83–0.96]

0.70 [0.58–0.82]

0.96 [0.81–0.99]

0.64 [0.61–0.67]

0.81 [0.77–0.84]

0.56 [0.50–0.61]

0.90 [0.85–0.93]

0.53 [0.39–0.67]

0.75 [0.51–0.90]

0.48 [0.27–0.69]

0.86 [0.49–0.97]

0.67 [0.65–0.69]

0.84 [0.82–0.87]

0.51 [0.47–0.56]

0.89 [0.87–0.90]

0.72 [0.39–1.00]

1.00 [0.44–1.00]

0.48 [0.39–0.58]

0.82 [0.67–0.91]

0.81 [0.71–0.91]

0.96 [0.81–0.99]

0.74 [0.57–0.90]

0.83 [0.55–0.95]

0.62 [0.56–0.67]

0.82 [0.74–0.87]

0.58 [0.49–0.68]

0.93 [0.82–0.98]

0.76 [0.68–0.83]

0.93 [0.83–0.97]

0.67 [0.54–0.79]

0.96 [0.79–0.99]

0.65 [0.57–0.72]

0.83 [0.73–0.90]

0.68 [0.59–0.78]

1.00 [0.91–1.00]