Table 2 Significant results of the ANOVAs on the RT data with stimulus type (hand vs. house vs. letter), laterality (ipsilateral vs. contralateral), rotation (medial vs. lateral), orientation (0° vs. 45° vs. 90° vs. 135° vs. 180°) and task (laterality judgment vs. matching) as within-participant factors and group (CRPS vs. control) as between-participant factor.

From: Atypical influence of biomechanical knowledge in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome-towards a different perspective on body representation

Reaction time

Factors

F

df

p

η2P

Group

7.95

1, 30

0.008

0.21

Stimulus

63.58

1.26, 37.95

0.000

0.68

Orientation

197.73

1.43, 42.86

0.000

0.87

Group x stimulus

12.28

1.26, 37.95

0.001

0.29

Group x rotation

8.38

1, 30

0.007

0.22

Group x rotation x orientation

3.51

2.33, 70.06

0.029

0.10

Group x rotation x laterality

5.84

1, 30

0.022

0.16

Stimulus x orientation

8.60

3.05, 91.47

0.000

0.22

Stimulus x orientation x rotation

3.80

4.73, 141.80

0.004

0.11

Stimulus x task

4.49

1.48, 44.48

0.026

0.13

  1. df degrees of freedom.