Table 1 Experimental protocol for the different groups (n = 11 rats each group). Groups I–III included rats with a veno-arterial anastomosis. Group I included rats with a veno-arterial anastomosis without preconditioning: the epigastric flap was raised, and a purely venous perfusion system was constructed. On the same day, the flap was sutured back into the epigastric defect (Fig. 1). In group II, a veno-arterial anastomosis was constructed, but the flap was raised and set back into the epigastric defect 7 days later for preconditioning. In group III, a similar venous-only perfusion was constructed, but the flap was raised and set back after an interval of 14 days for a longer preconditioning period. In the control group (IV), a standard arterial epigastric flap (based on the epigastric pedicle) was raised, the epigastric artery with its femoral origin was cut and re-anastomosed, and the flap was directly sutured back into the epigastric defect. All flaps were assessed 7 days after flap raising.
Group # | Day 0 | Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
I (+ 0 d) | Veno-arterial anastomosis and flap raising | Euthanasia and flap assessment | ||
II (+ 7 d) | Veno-arterial anastomosis | Flap raising | Euthanasia and flap assessment | |
III (+ 14 d) | Veno-arterial anastomosis | Flap raising | Euthanasia and flap assessment | |
IV–controlgroup (+ 0 d) | Arterial anastomosis and flap raising | Euthanasia and flap assessment |