Table 1 Results of quantitative EDS analysis in Fig. 4.
Tm [at.%] | Ni [at.%] | Sb [at.%] | |
|---|---|---|---|
20 \(^{\circ }\)C | |||
1.1 | 34.4(7) | 34.64(7) | 31.0(6) |
3.1 | 41.2(8) | 29.9(6) | 28.9(6) |
3.2 | 41.8(8) | 30.3(6) | 27.9(6) |
3.3 | 40.9(8) | 30.6(6) | 28.5(6) |
4.1 | 10.5(2) | 48.9(10) | 40.6(8) |
4.2 | 17.8(4) | 42.4(8) | 39.8(8) |
5.1 | 96.4(19) | 2.5(1) | 1.1(1) |
250 \(^{\circ }\)C | |||
1.1 | 34.9(7) | 32.6(7) | 32.5(7) |
2.1 | 39.4(8) | 23.5(5) | 37.1(7) |
4.1 | 2.4(1) | 51.5(10) | 46.1(9) |
4.2 | 4.2(1) | 49.9(10) | 45.9(9) |
4.3 | 2.8(1) | 51.2(10) | 46.0(9) |
5.1 | 68.0(14) | 16.6(3) | 15.4(3) |
500 \(^{\circ }\)C | |||
1.1 | 34.5(7) | 31.8(6) | 33.7(7) |
1.2 | 35.1(7) | 31.7(6) | 33.2(6) |
2.1 | 39.2(8) | 23.9(5) | 36.9(7) |
3.1 | 47.3(9) | 26.3(5) | 26.4(9) |
4.1 | 7.4(1) | 46.2(9) | 46.4(9) |
4.2 | 16.0(3) | 42.4(8) | 41.6(8) |
5.1 | 89.9(18) | 5.9(1) | 4.2(1) |
5.2 | 86.5(17) | 7.7(2) | 5.8(1) |
750 \(^{\circ }\)C | |||
1.1 | 34.7(7) | 32.6(7) | 32.7(7) |
1.2 | 35.5(7) | 34.3(7) | 30.2(6) |
3.1 | 37.1(7) | 33.5(7) | 29.4(6) |
3.2 | 38.8(8) | 31.3(6) | 29.9(6) |
4.1 | 3.5(1) | 50.9(10) | 45.6(9) |
4.2 | 5.7(1) | 49.8(10) | 44.5(9) |
6.1 | 28.3(6) | 36.9(7) | 34.8(7) |
6.2 | 20.8(4) | 40.2(8) | 39.0(8) |
1000 \(^{\circ }\)C | |||
2.1 | 39.8(8) | 22.8(5) | 37.4(7) |
2.2 | 39.0(8) | 24.9(5) | 36.1(7) |
2.3 | 36.8(7) | 28.8(6) | 34.4(7) |
2.4 | 38.1(8) | 26.4(5) | 35.5(7) |
3.1 | 38.0(8) | 30.6(6) | 31.4(6) |
3.2 | 43.4(9) | 28.8(6) | 27.8(6) |
3.3 | 37.9(8) | 29.3(6) | 32.8(7) |
6.1 | 24.2(5) | 68.3(14) | 7.5(2) |
6.2 | 21.2(4) | 45.5(9) | 33.3(7) |