Table 9 Performance analysis and comparison of different scheduling mechanisms.
From: Digital twin-based multi-level task rescheduling for robotic assembly line
| Â | \(f_{1}\)(s) | \(f_{2}\)(s) |
|---|---|---|
Objectives | < 232.8932 | < 7.8251 |
DT-based scheduling mechanism | 232.3642 | 4.2862 |
Scheduling mechanism without DT | 233.3279 | 6.0928 |