Table 2 Comparison results of transcript sequencing data.
From: Differentially expression analyses in fruit of cultivated and wild species of grape and peach
Species | Sample abbreviation | Total pairs | Mapped reads | Concordant pairs |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Grape | C_G_t1 | 15 933 645 | 82.80% | 77.60% |
C_G_t2 | 29 858 769 | 79.30% | 73.80% | |
C_G_t3 | 22 781 342 | 76.60% | 70.60% | |
C_G_leaf | 25 566 026 | 75.60% | 70.60% | |
W_G_t1 | 17 098 859 | 73.00% | 63.40% | |
W_G_t2 | 26 403 616 | 68.90% | 59.50% | |
W_G_t3 | 23 370 214 | 69.90% | 60.60% | |
W_G_leaf | 25 119 641 | 62.40% | 54.70% | |
Peach | C_P_t1 | 24 512 137 | 85.20% | 81.00% |
C_P_t2 | 17 326 896 | 88.20% | 84.20% | |
C_P_t3 | 30 382 911 | 88.10% | 84.40% | |
C_P_leaf | 16 055 962 | 87.60% | 83.60% | |
W_P_t1 | 15 770 694 | 86.50% | 82.20% | |
W_P_t2 | 17 409 126 | 88.20% | 84.20% | |
W_P_t3 | 29 320 743 | 87.10% | 84.30% | |
W_P_leaf | 26 376 610 | 85.80% | 81.50% |
