Table 1 Mean model with the level of uncertainty in the posterior utilizing individual inversion of DC synthetic data distorted with 10% noise from vPSOGWO, compared with results inverted by Chandra et al.15.

From: Nature-inspired stochastic hybrid technique for joint and individual inversion of DC and MT data

Layer parameters

True model

Search range

Inverted value

Lower

Upper

PSO

(Chandra et al.15)

GWO

(Chandra et al.15)

vPSOGWO

(PDF = 100% CI)

vPSOGWO

(PDF > 68.27% CI)

\({\rho }_{1}\) (Ωm)

2500

1000

5000

2679.4 ± 32.67

2698.2 ± 24.17

2572.94 ± 16.34

2575.29 ± 2.64

\({\rho }_{2}\) (Ωm)

100

1

1000

92.6 ± 40.5

104.8 ± 24.17

99.79 ± 1.72

100.05 ± 0.15

\({\rho }_{3}\) (Ωm)

300

10

3000

324.53 ± 20.51

327.0 ± 8.94

297.44 ± 2.02

297.76 ± 0.24

\({h}_{1}\) (m)

1.5

0.5

20

1.52 ± 0.04

1.5 ± 0.00

1.48 ± 0.01

1.48 ± 0.00

\({h}_{2}\) (m)

25

1

100

25.1 ± 12.14

24.91 ± 0.97

24.30 ± 1.04

24.47 ± 0.10

Fitness

NRMS = 0.102

NRMS = 0.095

RMS = 0.0218