Table 2 Sources of heterogeneity and subgroup analysis in the Spirulina dataset according to a random effects model.

From: Benefits of the microalgae Spirulina and Schizochytrium in fish nutrition: a meta-analysis

Grouping

k

SMD

95% CI

Q

I2

Family

 Acipenseridae

3

2.56

[− 0.753; 5.884]

61.7

96.8%

 Bagridae

5

-0.07

[− 0.372; 0.232]

1.8

0.0%

 Cichlidae*

38

1.20

[0.605; 1.802]

942.5

96.1%

 Clariidae*

8

0.23

[0.100; 0.357]

5.7

0.0%

 Cyprinidae

10

0.18

[− 0.054; 0.412]

21.3

57.7%

 Mugilidae*

10

5.11

[1.089; 9.121]

522.6

98.3%

 Oplegnathidae

3

2.16

[− 3.135; 7.459]

158.3

98.7%

 Osphronemidae

4

0.19

[− 0.430; 0.810]

10.6

71.7%

 Salmonidae

13

0.15

[− 0.859; 0.550]

194.5

93.8%

 Serranidae

5

2.43

[− 1.192; 6.055]

388.3

99.0%

 Serrasalmidae

2

1.23

[− 2.546; 5.001]

1.7

42.4%

 Test for subgroup differences

Q = 53.42, df = 10, P < 0.001

Habitat

 Freshwater*

82

0.705

[0.381; 1.022]

1531.2

94.7%

 Marine*

19

3.557

[1.336; 5.777]

1092.0

94.8%

 Test for subgroup differences

Q = 7.11, df 1, P = 0.008

Feeding

 Carnivores

26

0.680

[− 0.094; 1.454]

936.2

97.3%

 Omnivores*

28

1.862

[0.327; 3.396]

576.9

95.3%

 Herbivores*

47

1.177

[0.667; 1.687]

1181.7

96.1%

 Test for subgroup differences

Q = 2.37, df 2, P = 0.305

Measurement

 Individual data*

87

1.322

[0.776; 1.888]

2596.1

96.7%

 Batch data

14

0.436

[− 0.566; 1.437]

126.8

89.8%

 Test for subgroup differences

Q = 2.74, df = 1, P = 0.098

  1. Groups that display a positive effect of Spirulina on specificgrowth rate are denoted by an asterisk.
  2. k number of studies, SMD standardized mean difference compared to controls, 95% CI 95% confidence interval around SMD, Q Cochran’s measure of heterogeneity, I2 percentage of variability unaccounted by sampling error.