Figure 2 | Scientific Reports

Figure 2

From: Evidence of structural segmentation of the Uttarakhand Himalaya and its implications for earthquake hazard

Figure 2

Plots of individual RFs (for a Gaussian width factor, a = 2.0) as a function of the horizontal slowness after distance moveout correction for the Ps phase to a reference distance of 67◦ and slowness 6.4 s deg−1, for 15 broadband sites in the KG Himalaya, (a) GAI, (b) GDM, (c) GHAN, (d) GHAT, (e) GOPE, (f) HLD, (g) JOS, (h) KAL, (i) KAP, (j) KAN, (k) KAPG, and (l) KSN. The PRFs at each station show strong azimuthal variation. The arrivals of direct P and conversions from the Moho (Pms) and crustal multiples (i.e. PpPs and PpPs + PpSs) are marked by solid black lines. However, for some stations, where the arrival of PpPs + PpSs crustal multiple is weak, are not marked. Here, we have used IASP91 velocity model as the reference model for predictions.

Back to article page