Table 4 Differences for stationary behaviour and physical activity levels as percentage of time between the different software, CoLaus study, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2014–2017, on 2693 participants.
From: Comparison of different software for processing physical activity measurements with accelerometry
Stationary behaviour | Light physical activity | Moderate physical activity | Vigorous physical activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GENEACTIV vs | ||||
PAMPRO | − 9.6 [− 15.0; − 5.2] | − 0.7 [− 2.1; 0.9] | 11.2 [7.2; 16.4] | − 1.4 [− 1.9; − 1.0] |
GGIR-White | − 16.1 [− 20.2; − 12.6] | 0.8 [− 1.8; 3.3] | 14.9 [10.8; 20.3] | 0 [− 0.1; 0.1] |
GGIR-MRC, v.1.5–9 | − 3.1 [− 5.4; − 1.1] | − 10.5 [− 13.9; − 7.5] | 13.6 [9.8; 18.6] | 0 [− 0.1; 0] |
GGIR-MRC, v.1.11–1 | − 0.9 [− 2.5; 0.7] | − 12.4 [− 15.9; − 9.4] | 13.3 [9.5; 18.2] | − 0.1 [− 0.1; 0] |
PAMPRO vs | ||||
GGIR-White | − 6.4 [− 8.5; − 4.2] | 1.3 [− 1.0; 3.4] | 3.6 [2.8; 4.4] | 1.5 [1.1; 2.0] |
GGIR-MRC, v.1.5–9 | 6.4 [3.1; 10.1] | − 10.2 [− 13.9; − 6.8] | 2.4 [1.4; 3.2] | 1.4 [1.1; 1.9] |
GGIR-MRC, v.1.11–1 | 8.9 [5.2; 12.8] | − 12.2 [− 16.1; − 8.6] | 2.2 [1.0; 3.0] | 1.4 [1.0; 1.9] |
GGIR-White vs | ||||
GGIR-MRC, v.1.5–9 | 13.0 [10.5; 15.6] | − 11.5 [− 13.8; − 9.2] | − 1.3 [− 1.8; − 0.8] | − 0.1 [− 0.1; 0] |
GGIR-MRC, v.1.11–1 | 15.4 [12.5; 18.2] | − 13.5 [− 16.0; − 11.0] | − 1.5 [− 2.3; − 1.0] | − 0.1 [− 0.2; 0] |
GGIR-MRC, v.1.5–9 vs | ||||
GGIR-MRC, v.1.11–1 | 2.2 [1.1; 3.4] | − 1.9 [− 2.9; − 1.0] | − 0.2 [− 0.5; 0] | 0 [− 0.1; 0] |
