Table 2 Degradation efficiency and enzymatic activity of various microbial sources in the primary selectiona.

From: Taxonomic and enzymatic basis of the cellulolytic microbial consortium KKU-MC1 and its application in enhancing biomethane production

Source

Filter paper degradation rate (cm/day)

VS removal efficiency (%)

Enzyme activity (IU/mL)

FPase

CMCase

Avicelase

Xylanase

RSC

0.9 ± 0.30

51.95 ± 0.30

0.51 ± 0.25

0.02 ± 0.15

0.04 ± 0.18

0.66 ± 0.20

CM

0.6 ± 0.20

44.25 ± 0.15

0.48 ± 0.22

0.01 ± 0.25

0.02 ± 0.50

0.21 ± 0.21

GD

0.5 ± 0.15

45.85 ± 0.25

0.49 ± 0.15

0.01 ± 0.10

0.02 ± 0.20

0.16 ± 0.13

SGS

0.9 ± 0.15

50.81 ± 0.20

0.52 ± 0.10

0.02 ± 0.26

0.04 ± 0.10

0.41 ± 0.22

RF

0.5 ± 0.20

43.24 ± 0.30

0.47 ± 0.22

0.01 ± 0.25

0.04 ± 0.41

0.21 ± 0.15

TI

1.0 ± 0.10

52.46 ± 0.30

0.49 ± 0.20

0.04 ± 0.20

0.03 ± 0.55

0.52 ± 0.18

  1. aAll the data in each microbial source was measured when the filter paper complete degradation.
Back to article page