Table 4 Multivariate adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for MUO across tertiles of energy-adjusted egg consumption, stratified by BMI categories.1

From: The association between egg consumption and metabolic health status in overweight and obese adolescents

 

Tertiles of egg consumption

T1

T2

T3

P-trend

MUO phenotype based on IDF criteria

 Overweight (cases/participants)

12/27

11/36

4/41

 

  Crude

1.00

0.55 (0.19, 1.55)

0.17 (0.05, 0.57)

0.01

  Model 12

1.00

0.48 (0.16, 1.44)

0.18 (0.05, 0.67)

0.01

  Model 23

1.00

0.34 (0.98, 1.19)

0.18 (0.04, 0.73)

0.01

 Obese (cases/participants)

25/40

16/32

10/27

 

 Crude

1.00

0.60 (0.23, 1.54)

0.35 (0.12, 0.96)

0.04

  Model 12

1.00

0.56 (0.21, 1.51)

0.26 (0.08, 0.78)

0.01

  Model 23

1.00

0.65 (0.23, 1.81)

0.25 (0.07, 0.81)

0.02

MUO phenotype based on IDF /HOMA-IR criteria

 Overweight (cases/participants)

10/27

7/36

3/41

 

  Crude

1.00

0.41 (0.13, 1.27)

0.13 (0.03, 0.55)

0.01

  Model 12

1.00

0.33 (0.10, 1.14)

0.14 (0.03, 0.64)

0.01

  Model 23

1.00

0.25 (0.06, 0.99)

0.15 (0.03, 0.74)

0.01

 Obese (cases/participants)

23/40

14/32

10/27

 

  Crude

1.00

0.57 (0.22, 1.46)

0.43 (0.16, 1.18)

0.09

  Model 12

1.00

0.55 (0.20, 1.47)

0.33 (0.11, 0.99)

0.04

  Model 23

1.00

0.61 (0.22, 1.70)

0.33 (0.10, 1.04)

0.06

  1. 1All values are odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
  2. 2Model 1: Adjusted for sex, age, and energy intake.
  3. 3Model 2: Model 1 + further adjustments for SES and physical activity.