Table 3 Comparison analysis model for detection probability.

From: Distribution and abundance of Peleng Tarsier (Tarsius pelengensis) in Banggai Island group, Indonesia

Name

Delta AIC

AIC

ESW

D

D LCL

D UCL

D CV

Half normal (Cosine adjustment)

0.29

344.41

4.46

2.488

1.595

3.880

2.218

Half normal (Simple polynomial adjustment)

0.29

344.41

4.46

2.807

0.864

9.123

0.301

Half normal (Hermite polynomial adjustment)

0.29

344.41

4.46

2.488

1.595

3.880

0.218

Hazard rate (Cosine adjustment)

0.29

344.41

4.46

2.807

0.864

9.123

0.301

Hazard rate (Simple polynomial adjustment)

0.00

344.13

4.79

2.464

1.557

3.900

0.227

 Hazard rate (Hermite polynomial adjustment)

0.29

344.41

4.46

2.471

1.771

3.448

0.159

 Uniform (Cosine adjustment)

1.20

345.33

5.02

2.245

1.468

3.432

0.206

 Uniform (Simple polynomial adjustment)

1.65

345.78

4.93

2.690

2.054

3.521

0.137

 Uniform (Hermite polynomial adjustment)

1.65

345.78

4.93

2.293

1.488

3.534

0.211

  1. ESW effective strip width, D density of individual, D LCL density of individual analytic lower conf limit, D UCL density of individual analytic upper conf limit, D CV density of individual analytic coefficient of variance.
Back to article page