Table 2 Comparison of each measurement item between baseline and follow-up values.

From: Effects of tongue right positioner use on tongue pressure: a pilot study

Measurements (n = 8)

 

Baseline

Follow-up

P value

Effect size (r)

Mean ± S.D

Median (interquartile range)

Mean ± S.D

Median (interquartile range)

TPa

23.0 ± 13.4

19.0 (14.1–38.1)

31.5 ± 13.1

37.8 (22.5–40.3)

0.034*

0.84

 

ODK

/pa/b

5.0 ± 1.3

4.8 (4.0–6.0)

5.2 ± 1.3

4.6 (4.0–6.6)

0.285

0.45

/ta/a

5.0 ± 1.5

4.8 (3.6–6.6)

4.9 ± 1.4

4.6 (3.9–5.7)

0.668

0.27

/ka/a

4.1 ± 2.1

3.2 (2.8–6.1)

4.1 ± 2.1

3.0 (2.8–6.1)

0.172

0.53

PNIFa

95.8 ± 48.4

78.3 (55.8–114.2)

122.1 ± 58.6

115.8 (73.8–147.1)

0.197

0.48

 

Ultrasonographic assessment

CSA of GHb

174.9 ± 14.7

178.8 (175.1–182.6)

181.2 ± 24.0

188.0 (174.4–194.5)

0.484

0.25

 

Thickness of tonguea

30.5 ± 3.9

30.4 (28.5–33.7)

29.8 ± 3.4

30.6 (28.2–33.7)

0.588

0.21

  1. S.D standard deviation, TP tongue pressure, ODK oral diadochokinesis, PNIF peak nasal inspiratory flow, CSA of GH cross-sectional area of the geniohyoid muscle.
  2. aPaired t test was performed for TP, /ta/, and /ka/ of ODK, PNIF, and the thickness of the tongue in ultrasonographic measurement.
  3. bWilcoxon signed-rank test was performed for /pa/ of ODK and CSA of GH in ultrasonographic measurement.
  4. *Statistically significant (p < 0.05).