Table 4 Variables for accurate diagnosis according to logistic regression models.

From: Comparison between three types of needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of pancreatic solid masses: a multicenter observational study

Variable

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

OR (95% CI)

P-value

OR (95% CI)

P-value

Menghini-tip (vs. Franseen)

0.43 (0.25–0.73)

0.002

0.54 (0.29–1.00)

0.050

Reverse-bevel (vs. Franseen)

1.07 (0.67–1.68)

0.786

1.18 (0.71–1.94)

0.509

25-gauge (vs. 22-gauge)

1.23 (0.82–1.87)

0.320

  

Tumor size ≥ 2 cm (vs. < 2 cm)

5.36 (3.43–8.40)

 < 0.001

5.36 (3.40–8.47)

 < 0.001

Trans-gastric (vs. Trans-duodenal)

0.97 (0.66–1.43)

0.889

  

Needle pass ≥ 4 (vs. < 4)

1.83 (1.14–3.04)

0.152

  

Fanning technique (vs. no fanning)

2.17 (1.38–3.38)

 < 0.001

1.70 (1.00–2.86)

0.047

20 ml of suction (vs. 10 ml of suction)

1.08 (0.73–1.60)

0.696

  

Application of stylet (vs. no stylet)

0.77 (0.46–1.25)

0.310

  
  1. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.