Table 4 Comparison of nHA;Ze;MOF@NTD with other methods for sampling and analysis of aromatic amine compounds.

From: Urinary bio-monitoring of aromatic amine derivatives by new needle trap device packed with the multi-component adsorbent

Methods

Current method (ng. L−1)

HS-SPME/PEG@CNTs (ng. L−1)14

HS-SPME/PDMS-IL (ng. mL−1)143

HS-SPME/HIL-doped PANI (µg.L−1)42

HS-SPME/PANI (µg.ml−1)44

Parameters

LOD

LOQ

LDR (107)

LOD

LOQ

LDR (105)

LOD

LOQ

LDR

LOD

LOQ

LDR

LOD (10–3)

LOQ

LDR

Comparison

Aniline

0.3

0.8

700

0.5

1

1

0.01

0.05

0.05–500

0.024

NR

0.195–100

0.69

NR

0.069–27.5

Dimethylaniline

0.3

0.8

700

0.5

1

1

0.001

0.005

0.005–500

NR

NR

NR

1.06

NR

0.053–21.3

2-Chloroaniline

3

8

700

5

50

50

0.1

0.5

0.5–500

0.012

NR

0.097–50

0.02

NR

0.0051–20.4

3-Chloroaniline

32

350

700

50

500

500

0.1

0.5

0.5–500

0.048

NR

0.390–100

NR

NR

NR