Table 2 Model performance to predict metastasis in ML approaches using 5-fold cross validation in original data and Balance data with oversampling method.
From: Predicting metastasis in gastric cancer patients: machine learning-based approaches
Models | Dataset | Sensitivity% | Specificity% | Precision% | F1 | AUC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LR | Original data | Train | .86 | .86 | .76 | .81 | .93 |
Test | .86 | .78 | .77 | .81 | .88 | ||
Balanced data | Train | .93 | .83 | .88 | .87 | .93 | |
Test | .90 | .78 | .84 | .84 | .86 | ||
NN | Original data | Train | .93 | .93 | .88 | .88 | .98 |
Test | .76 | .78 | .75 | .77 | .86 | ||
Balanced data | Train | .98 | .87 | .95 | .95 | .99 | |
Test | .91 | .81 | .86 | .86 | .87 | ||
RF | Original data | Train | .89 | .95 | .92 | .90 | .98 |
Test | .80 | .83 | .80 | .80 | .87 | ||
Balanced data | Train | .98 | .95 | .96 | .96 | .99 | |
Test | .91 | .78 | .85 | .85 | .87 | ||
NB | Original data | Train | .83 | .85 | .74 | .79 | .90 |
Test | .89 | .78 | .77 | .83 | .88 | ||
Balanced data | Train | .87 | .84 | .86 | .86 | .91 | |
Test | .86 | .81 | .83 | .83 | .86 | ||
DT | Original data | Train | .82 | .97 | .94 | .88 | .96 |
Test | .58 | .78 | .69 | .63 | .75 | ||
Balanced data | Train | .94 | .96 | .95 | .95 | .98 | |
Test | .80 | .81 | .80 | .80 | .83 | ||
SVM | Original data | Train | .94 | .86 | .77 | .84 | .94 |
Test | .92 | .76 | .76 | .85 | .85 | ||
Balanced data | Train | .98 | .87 | .93 | .92 | .93 | |
Test | .93 | .80 | .87 | .86 | .85 | ||