Table 2 Estimation results.

From: The spatial spillover effect of higher SO2 emission tax rates on PM2.5 concentration in China

Variables

 

Robustness tests

Heterogeneity analysis

Model A

Model B

Model C

Model D

Model E

Model F

Model G

Model H

Model I

Model J

Model K

Base-line Model

PSM-Spatial-DID

Spatial-DID-2SLS Model

Spatial weight matrix: We

Interpreted variable: PMCH

Interpreted variable: PME

Eastern cities (EAST)

Administrative level (CLEVEL)

Pilot cities of emission rights trading (PET)

Key regions of APPCAP (PCAP)

NOx emission tax rate reform (REFNF)

POST × FSDIOX

− 0.039***

− 0.047***

− 0.02**

− 0.024***

− 0.033***

− 0.117***

− 0.049***

− 0.02**

− 0.032***

− 0.025***

− 0.034***

(− 6.451)

(− 8.33)

(− 2.33)

(-4.786)

(− 7.716)

(− 8.266)

(− 4.661)

(− 2.09)

(− 4.294)

(− 3.453)

(− 3.563)

W × POST × FSDIOX

0.119***

0.148***

0.022

0.216***

0.106***

0.290***

0.184***

0.34***

0.15***

0.110***

0.144***

(4.225)

(5.648)

(0.64)

(3.063)

(5.211)

(4.504)

(3.295)

(3.164)

(3.594)

(2.933)

(3.104)

W × PM

(Interpreted Variable)

0.981***

0.977***

2.09***

− 0.075

0.981***

0.984***

0.983***

0.983***

0.981***

(304.057)

(244.672)

(19.54)

(–0.797)

(304.331)

(361.466)

(340.950)

(339.768)

(303.862)

W × PMCH

(Interpreted Variable)

0.986***

(411.608)

W × PME

(Interpreted Variable)

0.928***

(79.313)

Control Variables

Controlled

Controlled

Controlled

Controlled

Controlled

Controlled

Controlled

Controlled

Controlled

Controlled

Controlled

           

D.E._POST × FSDIOX

− 0.024***

− 0.030***

− 0.019**

− 0.024***

− 0.014***

− 0.109***

− 0.022**

0.062**

− 0.005

− 0.010**

− 0.016**

(− 4.024)

(− 6.091)

(− 2.257)

(− 4.882)

(− 2.717)

(− 9.713)

(− 1.990)

(2.387)

(− 0.629)

(− 2.393)

(− 2.133)

I.E._ POST × FSDIOX

4.505***

4.449***

0.029**

0.204***

5.411***

2.737***

8.496***

22.932***

7.534***

5.044***

5.776***

(2.899)

(3.731)

(2.093)

(2.917)

(3.092)

(2.912)

(3.292)

(3.238)

(3.399)

(2.756)

(3.297)

D.E._POST × FSDIOX × EAST

-

-

0.001

(0.083)

I.E._POST × FSDIOX × EAST

− 5.309**

(− 2.053)

D.E._POST × FSDIOX × CLEVEL

− 0.069***

(− 3.424)

I.E._POST × FSDIOX × CLEVEL

− 15.264***

(− 2.735)

D.E._POST × FSDIOX × PET

− 0.036***

(− 3.102)

D.E._POST × FSDIOX × PET

− 0.036***

(− 3.102)

I.E._POST × FSDIOX × PCAP

− 0.043***

(− 4.142)

I.E._POST × FSDIOX × PCAP

− 3.209

(− 0.817)

I.E._POST × FSDIOX × REFNF

− 0.010

(− 1.397)

I.E._POST × FSDIOX × REFNF

− 1.703*

(− 1.851)

 

 

Observations

4560

3936

4560

4560

4560

4275

4560

4560

4560

4560

4560

Number of cities

285

246

285

285

285

285

285

285

285

285

285

R2

0.9736

0.9768

0.9736

0.9597

0.9858

0.9854

0.9736

0.9737

0.9736

0.9737

0.9736

Wald spatial lag test

401.585***

193.251***

100.208***

555.096***

215.846***

410.056***

400.756***

401.969***

404.417***

401.822***

394.278***

LR spatial lag test

407.764***

201.067***

407.764***

561.502***

224.662***

417.219***

406.938***

409.178***

411.546***

408.468***

400.686***

Wald spatial error test

451.871***

224.211***

109.747***

558.045***

263.812***

413.476***

451.17***

455.437***

456.579***

454.439***

446.576***

LR spatial error test

455.728***

232.09***

455.728***

559.485***

271.616***

417.575***

454.801***

459.925***

460.666***

459.435***

451.002***

LR spatial fixed effects test

11,108.394***

10,086.787***

10,088.703***

11,108.394***

13,335.203***

14,624.605***

11,105.64***

11,116.038***

11,111.6***

11,126.816***

11,055.903***

LR time fixed effects test

3186.68***

3242.986***

1578.417***

3186.680***

6688.258***

1615.188***

3189.912***

3194.548***

3173.147***

3194.900***

3183.774***

  1. Note: The t-statistics are marked in parentheses. *, **, and *** denote significance at 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively. D.E. before the variable symbol indicates direct effect, and I.E. indicates indirect effect. The complete estimation results are reported in Table A.2 in the appendices.