Table 3 Some antioxidants and proline of some rice genotypes affected by the planting methods.

From: Response of varied rice genotypes on cell membrane stability, defense system, physio-morphological traits and yield under transplanting and aerobic cultivation

Treatment

Catalase (µmol min−1 g−1 protein)

Peroxidase (µmol min−1 g−1 protein)

SOD (µmol min−1 g−1 protein)

Proline (mgg−1 FW)

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

Planting method (T)

 Transplanting rice

0.069b

0.070b

1.44b

1.36b

0.269b

0.260b

2.17b

2.23b

 Aerobic cultivation

0.107a

0.118a

1.94a

1.89a

0.386a

0.371a

19.89a

20.15a

 F. test

*

*

**

**

**

**

**

**

Rice genotype (V)

 1-Giza177

0.049gh

0.056d

1.17f.

1.21f.

0.205 g

0.201f.

6.76f.

6.48f.

 2-Sakha102

0.052 g

0.051d

1.24ef

1.30ef

0.218 g

0.205f.

8.10e

8.34e

 3-Giza178

0.111c

0.116b

1.50c

1.75c

0.360d

0.355c

13.47b

14.07b

 4-Giza179

0.123b

0.118b

2.06b

2.09b

0.443c

0.433b

13.92b

14.35ab

 5-Sakha106

0.046 h

0.045d

1.23ef

1.22f.

0.155 h

0.128 g

6.60f.

6.80f.

 6-Sakha107

0.068f.

0.070 cd

1.31e

1.30ef

0.281f.

0.281e

10.74d

11.26c

 7-A22

0.103d

0.103bc

1.27e

1.32e

0.305e

0.315d

11.77c

11.39c

 8-E. Yasmine

0.072e

0.073 cd

1.50d

1.47d

0.295ef

0.286e

10.50d

9.90d

 9-EHR1

0.128a

0.138ab

2.57a

2.48a

0.526a

0.493a

14.76a

15.10a

 10-GZ9399

0.129a

0.166a

2.52a

2.23a

0.486b

0.450b

13.65b

14.13b

 F. test

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

Interaction (V × T)

**

NS

**

**

**

**

**

**

  1. Means followed by a common letter at the same column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range at 0.05 levels.
  2. *Significant at 0.05 level.
  3. **Significant at 0.01 level and NS = Not significant.
Back to article page