Table 7 Membrane stability index, leaf relative water content and chlorophyll of rice genotypes affected by planting methods.

From: Response of varied rice genotypes on cell membrane stability, defense system, physio-morphological traits and yield under transplanting and aerobic cultivation

Treatment

Membrane stability index (%)

RWC (%)

Chlorophyll content

2020

2021

2020

2021

2020

2021

Planting method (T)

 Transplanting rice

3.20b

3.21b

89.33a

88.69a

37.10a

38.20a

 Aerobic cultivation

12.19a

13.27a

77.24b

75.40b

30.05b

30.03b

 F. test

**

**

**

**

**

**

Rice genotype (V)

 1-Giza177

12.03b

13.10a

71.58g

69.93g

31.60ef

32.15d

 2-Sakha102

11.41b

11.66b

80.13f

77.78f

32.41e

32.30d

 3-Giza178

5.60d

6.10ef

86.33b

85.91b

33.50d

35.43b

 4-Giza179

4.76e

5.23fg

89.48a

88.41a

35.27c

36.58b

 5-Sakha106

12.91a

13.76a

81.86e

78.06ef

29.01g

30.88d

 6-Sakha107

7.16c

8.23c

82.14de

80.06de

34.51cd

33.99c

 7-A22

6.34cd

6.65de

83.87cd

83.28c

30.76f

32.11d

 8-E. Yasmine

6.85c

7.56cd

83.34de

81.83cd

31.33ef

31.66d

 9-EHR1

5.60d

5.48fg

84.76bc

86.22b

40.06a

39.28a

 10-GZ9399

4.15e

4.58g

89.36da

88.40a

37.27b

36.73b

F. test

**

**

**

**

**

**

Interaction (V × T)

**

**

**

**

**

**

  1. **Significant at 0.01 level. Means followed by a common letter at the same column are not significantly different according to Duncan’s multiple range at 0.05 levels.
Back to article page