Table 2 Regression models.
From: The role of INTERCheckWEB digital innovation in supporting polytherapy management
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
Control variables | |||
Patient’s age | 0.068* | 0.031 | − 0.073* |
Patient’s autonomy | − 0.015 | 0.203* | 0.303* |
Patient’s BMI | 0.542* | 0.383* | 0.505* |
Independent variables | |||
Negative clinician’s behaviour towards guidelines and clinical protocols | − 0.060 | − 0.061 | |
Positive clinician’s behaviour towards guidelines and clinical protocols | − 0.024 | − 0.104 | |
INTERcheckWEB perceived usefulness | − 0.089 | − 0.084 | |
INTERcheckWEB perceived ease of use | 0.150* | 0.298* | |
Clinician’s seniority | 0.083* | 0.087* | |
Patient’s polytherapy | 0.599* | 0.541* | |
Patient’s comorbidities | − 0.283* | 0.302* | |
Moderators | |||
Patient’s polytherapy X patient’s comorbidities | − 0.370* | ||
Quality of available patient’s data X patient’s polytherapy | − 0.661* | ||
Clinician’s seniority X positive clinician’s behavior towards guidelines and clinical protocols | 0.083 | ||
Clinician’s seniority X INTERcheckWEB perceived usefulness | − 0.035 | ||
Clinician’s seniority X INTERcheckWEB perceived ease of use | − 0.134 | ||
R2 | 0.305 | 0.516 | 0.550 |
Adjusted R2 | 0.301 | 0.506 | 0.537 |
F value | 76.236* | 54.751* | 41.555* |
Δ R2 | 0.305 | 0.211 | 0.035 |
F(ΔR2) | 76.236* | 31.954* | 7.859* |