Table 8 The results of five statistical methods.

From: Comparative study on landslide susceptibility mapping based on unbalanced sample ratio

Classifiers

Statistical methods

1:1

1:2

1:4

1:8

1:16

CNN model

OA

0.681

0.848

0.912

0.939

0.940

Precision

0.133

0.208

0.254

0.319

0.303

Recall

0.777

0.540

0.238

0.016

0

F-Measure

0.227

0.300

0.246

0.031

0.001

MCC

0.297

0.347

0.269

0.079

0.012

C5.0 model

OA

0.932

0.953

0.970

0.979

0.983

Precision

0.465

0.581

0.728

0.855

0.949

Recall

0.845

0.808

0.790

0.780

0.757

F-Measure

0.600

0.676

0.758

0.816

0.842

MCC

0.611

0.674

0.750

0.809

0.840

SVM model

OA

0.845

0.892

0.924

0.942

0.945

Precision

0.260

0.329

0.410

0.521

0.632

Recall

0.857

0.765

0.608

0.411

0.198

F-Measure

0.399

0.460

0.490

0.459

0.302

MCC

0.455

0.488

0.497

0.464

0.354

LR model

OA

0.799

0.859

0.904

0.931

0.940

Precision

0.212

0.261

0.318

0.393

0.475

Recall

0.857

0.730

0.513

0.271

0.097

F-Measure

0.340

0.385

0.392

0.321

0.161

MCC

0.394

0.426

0.410

0.338

0.221

  1. Significant values are in Italic.