Table 8 The results of five statistical methods.
From: Comparative study on landslide susceptibility mapping based on unbalanced sample ratio
Classifiers | Statistical methods | 1:1 | 1:2 | 1:4 | 1:8 | 1:16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNN model | OA | 0.681 | 0.848 | 0.912 | 0.939 | 0.940 |
Precision | 0.133 | 0.208 | 0.254 | 0.319 | 0.303 | |
Recall | 0.777 | 0.540 | 0.238 | 0.016 | 0 | |
F-Measure | 0.227 | 0.300 | 0.246 | 0.031 | 0.001 | |
MCC | 0.297 | 0.347 | 0.269 | 0.079 | 0.012 | |
C5.0 model | OA | 0.932 | 0.953 | 0.970 | 0.979 | 0.983 |
Precision | 0.465 | 0.581 | 0.728 | 0.855 | 0.949 | |
Recall | 0.845 | 0.808 | 0.790 | 0.780 | 0.757 | |
F-Measure | 0.600 | 0.676 | 0.758 | 0.816 | 0.842 | |
MCC | 0.611 | 0.674 | 0.750 | 0.809 | 0.840 | |
SVM model | OA | 0.845 | 0.892 | 0.924 | 0.942 | 0.945 |
Precision | 0.260 | 0.329 | 0.410 | 0.521 | 0.632 | |
Recall | 0.857 | 0.765 | 0.608 | 0.411 | 0.198 | |
F-Measure | 0.399 | 0.460 | 0.490 | 0.459 | 0.302 | |
MCC | 0.455 | 0.488 | 0.497 | 0.464 | 0.354 | |
LR model | OA | 0.799 | 0.859 | 0.904 | 0.931 | 0.940 |
Precision | 0.212 | 0.261 | 0.318 | 0.393 | 0.475 | |
Recall | 0.857 | 0.730 | 0.513 | 0.271 | 0.097 | |
F-Measure | 0.340 | 0.385 | 0.392 | 0.321 | 0.161 | |
MCC | 0.394 | 0.426 | 0.410 | 0.338 | 0.221 |