Table 1 General hunting behavior and structural characteristics in three groups of hunters.

From: The importance of structural, situational, and psychological factors for involving hunters in the adaptive flyway management of geese

 

Non-goose hunters (N = 675)

Lapsed goose hunters (N = 278)

Goose hunters (N = 606)

Effect size

Cramers’ V

Partial η2

General hunting behavior

Started hunting

0–10 years ago

33%

8%

26%***

0.18

na

11–20 years ago

17%

12%

17%

  

21–30 years ago

19%

21%

20%

  

31 years or more ago

31%

59%

38%

  

Hunting activity in 2021

No

11%

8%

2%***

0.24

na

1–10 days

42%

28%

21%

  

11–20 days

23%

23%

22%

  

21–50 days

18%

28%

38%

  

More than 50 days

6%

13%

19%

  

Structural characteristics

Parent was a goose hunter

5%

22%

27%***

0.28

na

Gender

86% men

94% men

94% men***

0.13

na

Age

50 yearsa

53 yearsb

49 yearsa

na

0.02

University degree

47%

37%

36%***

0.10

na

Rural residence

65%

73%

71%*

0.07

na

  1. Means having the same superscript letter did not differ at p < 0.05 (ANOVA with Bonferroni correction). Following guidelines proposed by Cohen65, a small, medium, and large effect size correspond to Cramer’s V = 0.1–0.3, Cramer’s V = 0.3–0.5, and Cramer’s V > 0.5 for 1 df (i.e., parent was a goose hunter, gender, university degree, and rural residence), Cramer’s V = 0.07–0.21, Cramer’s V = 0.21–0.35, and Cramer’s V > 0.35 for 2 df (i.e., started hunting, hunting activity in 2021), and Partial η2 = 0.01, Parital η2 = 0.06, and Partial η2 = 0.14 (i.e., age), respectively.
  2. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001. na = non-applicable.