Figure 5
High m6A score associated with better prognosis. (A) Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of OSCC patients in different m6A score groups. Low-m6A score group, blue curve; High-m6A score group, red curve. Log-rank p < 0.001 showed a significant survival difference between two groups. (B) Differences in m6A score between alive and dead patients in TCGA and GSE41613 cohort. Alive, blue; Dead, red. Top edge of box: upper quartile; bottom edge of box: lower quartile; internal horizontal line: median. Dots above and below: outliers. The upper number represented p value. (C) The proportion of alive and dead patients in the low-m6A score group and the high-m6A score group. Alive, blue; Dead, red. Numbers in the barplots represented percentages. (D) Differences in m6A score between m6A clusters. Cluster A, blue; Cluster B, yellow. Top edge of box: upper quartile; bottom edge of box: lower quartile; internal horizontal line: median. Dots represented samples and the upper number represented p value. (E) Differences in m6A score between gene clusters. Gene cluster A, blue; Gene cluster B, yellow. Top edge of box: upper quartile; bottom edge of box: lower quartile; internal horizontal line: median. Dots represented samples and the upper number represented p value. (F) Sankey diagram showing the correlations among m6A clusters, gene clusters, m6A score and fustat.
