Table 1 Characteristics of the study participants and numbers of “sensitive” subjects according to the different sensitivity scales.

From: Influence of face masks on the subjective impairment at different physical workloads

 

All

Men

Women

N = 40

N = 20

N = 20

Age (years), median (range)

47 (19–65)

49 (19–65)

44 (23–61)

Height (cm), median (range)

180 (160–196)

185 (175–196)

170 (160–182)

Weight (kg), median (range)

75 (57–121)

85 (72–121)

68 (57–90)

Smoker, n (%)

8 (20%)

2 (10%)

6 (30%)

Former smoker, n (%)

13 (33%)

7 (35%)

6 (30%)

Mild asthma, n (%)

2 (5%)

2 (10%)

0 (0%)

Arterial hypertension, n (%)

5 (13%)

3 (15%)

2 (10%)

Atopy (sx1 ≥ 0,35 kU/L), n (%)

22 (55%)

11 (55%)

11 (55%)

“Well-trained” according to PWC130

20 (50%)

9 (45%)

11 (55%)

“Sensitive” according to

 EWS, n (%)

16 (40%)

7 (35%)

9 (45%)

 DIS, n (%)

22 (55%)

9 (45%)

13 (65%)

 DIS-I, n (%)

22 (55%)

10 (50%)

12 (60%)

 DIS-A, n (%)

18 (45%)

9 (45%)

9 (45%)

 PANAS-NA, n (%)

22 (55%)

9 (45%)

13 (65%)

 COSS, n (%)

18 (45%)

6 (30%)

12 (60%)

 CSS, n (%)

20 (50%)

8 (40%)

12 (60%)

“Sensitive” according to at least 5 sensitivity scales, n (%)

11 (28%)

3 (15%)

8 (40%)

  1. The cut-offs of PWC130 (physical working capacity at a heart rate of 130 beats per minute) for trained subjects were defined as > 1.5 (men) and > 1.4 (women)27.
  2. Sensitivity scales: Environmental Worry Scale (EWS), Discomfort Intolerance Scale (DIS), Intolerance of Discomfort or Pain (DIS-I), Avoidance of Physical Discomfort (DIS-A), Negative Affectivity (PANAS-NA), Chemical Odor Sensitivity Scale (COSS), Chemical Sensitivity Scale (CSS).