Table 1 Comparison of the experimental results using two different algorithms.
Method | Evaluation | KITTI1 | KITTI2 | CUIT-CS | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zhou’s | P | 0.697 | 0.610 | 0.41 | 0.572 |
R | 0.721 | 0.767 | 0.91 | 0.799 | |
F | 0.708 | 0.680 | 0.57 | 0.653 | |
Lin’s | P | 0.227 | 0.452 | 0.45 | 0.376 |
R | 0.492 | 0.883 | 0.56 | 0.645 | |
F | 0.312 | 0.598 | 0.50 | 0.47 | |
Zhang’s | P | 0.892 | 0.855 | 0.937 | 0.895 |
R | 0.588 | 0.613 | 0.333 | 0.511 | |
F | 0.709 | 0.714 | 0.491 | 0.638 | |
Ours | P | 0.825 | 0.783 | 0.894 | 0.734 |
R | 0.818 | 0.853 | 0.805 | 0.825 | |
F | 0.821 | 0.816 | 0.844 | 0.827 |