Table 3 Comparison of patients with and without surgical site infections following osteosynthesis for pelvic ring injury.

From: Morel–Lavallee lesions and number of surgeries for associated injuries predict surgical site infection risk following pelvic ring injury osteosynthesis

 

Patients with SSI (n = 8)

Patients without SSI (n = 89)

p value

Age, years, median

35 (IQR, 28)

38 (IQR, 31)

0.4

Sex, n (%)

0.5

 Male

2 (25.0%)

39 (43.8%)

 Female

6 (75.0%)

50 (56.2%)

Diabetes, n (%)

1 (12.5%)

4 (4.5%)

0.4

Smoker, n (%)

2 (25%)

9 (10.1%)

0.2

BMI, median

25.6 (IQR, 6.0)

21.9 (IQR, 5.5)

0.2

ISS, median

20 (IQR, 13–28)

16.5 (IQR, 8–24)

0.1

NISS, median

27 (IQR, 22–38)

17 (IQR, 12–29)

0.1

Open fracture, n (%)

3 (37.5%)

16 (18%)

0.2

AO classificationa

0.06

 61-A

0

8 (9.0%)

 61-B

1 (12.5%)

42 (47.2%)

 61-C

7 (87.5%)

39 (43.8%)

Osteosynthesis

0.45

 ORIF

5 (62.5%)

66 (74.2%)

 CRIF or ESF

3 (37.5%)

23 (25.8%)

Stage operation, n (%)

4 (50.0%)r

12 (13.5%)

0.02*

Number of other surgeries, median

5 (IQR, 5)

2 (IQR, 2)

0.03*

Arterial embolization, n (%)

5 (62.5%)

34 (38.2%)

0.2

Rectum injury, n (%)

1 (12.5%)

5 (5.6%)

0.41

Urogenital injury, n (%)

2 (25%)

10(11.2%)

0.3

Morel–Lavallee lesions, n (%)

4 (50%)

5 (5.6%)

0.002*

Colostomy, n (%)

3 (37.5%)

8 (9.0%)

0.05

ICU length of stay, days, median

6 (IQR, 5.5)

3 (IQR, 5)

0.01*

Time to bony union, months, median

6 (IQR, 3.5)

6 (IQR, 1)

0.6

Follow up, months, median

36 (IQR, 3.5)

36 (IQR, 8.5)

0.5

  1. SSI surgical site infection, BMI body mass index, CRIF, closed reduction and internal fixation, ICU intensive care unit, ISS injury severity score, NISS new injury severity score, ORIF open reduction and internal fixation, IQR interquartile range.
  2. aThe classification of pelvic fractures was based on the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO/OTA) classification (2018 revision).
  3. *Statistical significance.