Table 7 This table shows that participants with intermediate and high scores on the General Externally Oriented Thinking subscale tend to use affective terminologies more frequently than controls. Based on Bonferroni correction, differences in G-EOT subscale are not significant (p < 0.016).

From: Experiments on real-life emotions challenge Ekman's model

G-EOT

High alexithymia

Medium alexithymia

Low alexithymia

High alexithymia

 

0.025945

0.021025

Medium alexithymia

0.025945

 

0.503385

Low alexithymia

0.021025

0.503385