Table 8 This table shows that participants with low scores on the General Externally Oriented Thinking subscale tend to describe scenarios as non-canonically affective (other) more than individuals with high alexithymia scores. Based on Bonferroni correction, differences in G-EOT are not significant (p < 0.016).
From: Experiments on real-life emotions challenge Ekman's model
G-EOT | High alexithymia | Medium alexithymia | Low alexithymia |
|---|---|---|---|
High alexithymia | 0.024778 | 0.020679 | |
Medium alexithymia | 0.024778 | 0.506031 | |
Low alexithymia | 0.020679 | 0.506031 |