Table 8 This table shows that participants with low scores on the General Externally Oriented Thinking subscale tend to describe scenarios as non-canonically affective (other) more than individuals with high alexithymia scores. Based on Bonferroni correction, differences in G-EOT are not significant (p < 0.016).

From: Experiments on real-life emotions challenge Ekman's model

G-EOT

High alexithymia

Medium alexithymia

Low alexithymia

High alexithymia

 

0.024778

0.020679

Medium alexithymia

0.024778

 

0.506031

Low alexithymia

0.020679

0.506031