Table 5 Comparison of the misdiagnosis ratio of each reader while evaluating the standard image with and without the soft tissue image.
Years of experience | Overlapped with bone (n = 131) | Not overlapped with bone (n = 24) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standard image alone | Standard and soft tissue images | P value | Standard image alone | Standard and soft tissue images | P value | |
26 (reader 1) | 11.5% (15/131) | 7.6% (10/131) | 0.096 | 4.2% (1/24) | 8.3% (2/24) | 0.317 |
14 (reader 2) | 17.6% (23/131) | 12.2% (16/131) | 0.144 | 12.5% (3/24) | 12.5% (3/24) | 1.000 |
8 (reader 3) | 21.4% (28/131) | 7.6% (10/131) | < 0.001 | 16.6% (4/24) | 8.3% (2/24) | 0.157 |
6 (reader 4) | 22.1% (29/131) | 14.5% (19/131) | 0.050 | 25.0% (6/24) | 4.2% (1/24) | 0.025 |
3 (reader 5) | 35.9% (47/131) | 16.0% (21/131) | < 0.001 | 41.7% (10/24) | 20.8% (5/24) | 0.059 |
