Table 4 Results of the mean rank, Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U statistical tests for the scoring systems used to test the healing effects of the tested materials on tibial bone defects with the different parameters.

From: Intramedullary bone tissue reaction of ion-releasing resin-modified glass-ionomer restoration versus two calcium silicate-based cements: an animal study

Parameter

Control

ACTIVA

MTA HP

iRoot BP Plus

P

New bone formation

26.11

32.89

83.50

83.50

0.000

 

P1 = 0.026

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.000

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.000, P3 = 1.000

Inflammatory response

95.93

39.50

47.21

43.36

0.000

 

P1 = 0.000

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.040

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.015, P3 = 0.392

Angiogenesis

91.23

41.73

49.75

43.29

0.000

 

P1 = 0.000

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.054

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.018, P3 = 0.099

Granulation tissue

94.00

15.00

61.23

55.77

0.000

 

P1 = 0.000

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.000

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.000, P3 = 0.196

Osteoblasts

39.50

27.50

79.50

79.50

0.000

 

P1 = 0.038

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.000

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.000, P3 = 1.000

Osteoclasts

15.50

41.50

85.00

84.00

0.000

 

P1 = 0.000

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.000

P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.000, P3 = 0.556

  1. Kruskal Wallis, Mann–Whitney U, P1: significance Vs control, P2: significance Vs ACTVA and P3: significant Vs MTA HP, Significant at ≤ 0.05.