Table 3 Comparison of the three features between the CM and non-CM groups.
From: A screening method for cervical myelopathy using machine learning to analyze a drawing behavior
| Â | Spiral | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Non-CM group | CM group | p-value | |
DT (IQR) (seconds) | 9.5 (8.0–11.7) | 9.8 (8.6–11.2) | 0.67 |
AP (IQR) | 1.8 (1.3–2.3) | 1.2 (0.8–1.7) | 0.00077 |
SP (IQR) | − 102.8 (− 117.2, − 57.5) | − 116.3 (− 128.8, − 80.0) | 0.01 |
| Â | Square wave | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Non-CM group | CM group | p-value | |
DT (IQR) (seconds) | 5.6 (4.3–7.7) | 5.8 (5.1–8.3) | 0.28 |
AP (IQR) | 1.5 (1.2–2.1) | 1.0 (0.7–1.6) | 0.00095 |
SP (IQR) | − 56.9 (− 70, − 41.4) | − 61 (− 80.5, − 45.3) | 0.31 |
| Â | Triangular wave | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Non-CM group | CM group | p-value | |
DT (IQR) (seconds) | 5.0 (3.8–7.0) | 5.4 (4.4–7.5) | 0.35 |
AP (IQR) | 1.5 (1.2–2.1) | 1.1 (0.7–1.6) | 0.002 |
SP (IQR) | − 53.2 (− 67.0, − 34.7) | − 61.4 (− 74.2, − 43.1) | 0.05 |
