Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31772-9, published online 23 March 2023

The original version of this Article contained errors in Table 6, where the “FP” and “FN” values were interchanged. The correct and incorrect values appear below.

Incorrect:

 

TB likely - Yes

TB likely - No

TB - Yes

15 (TP)

5 (FN)

TB - No

9 (FP)

36 (TN)

Correct:

 

TB likely - Yes

TB likely - No

TB - Yes

15 (TP)

9 (FN)

TB - No

5 (FP)

36 (TN)

The original Article has been corrected.