Table 1 Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of endometrial cancer patients who underwent robotic surgical staging using da Vinci SP (n = 42) or Xi system (n = 126).

From: Comparing surgical outcomes of da Vinci SP and da Vinci Xi for endometrial cancer surgical staging in a propensity score-matched study

 

SP (n = 42)

Xi (n = 126)

p-value

Age, years, Mean ± SD

48.7 ± 8.8

48.6 ± 8.7

0.927

Body mass index, kg/m2, Mean ± SD

24.4 ± 4.7

25.3 ± 5.1

0.274

Gravidity, Median (IQR)

2 (1–3)

2 (1–3)

0.734

Parity, Median (IQR)

2 (0–2)

2 (0–2)

0.683

Menopause, n (%)

18 (42.8)

41 (32.5)

0.225

Previous abdominal surgery, n (%)

14 (33.3)

34 (27.0)

0.430

ASA class, n (%)

0.979

 I

7 (16.7)

22 (17.5)

 

 II

31 (73.8)

91 (72.2)

 

 III

4(9.5)

13 (10.3)

 

FIGO stage, n (%)

0.708

 I

38 (90.4)

110 (87.3)

 

 II

2 (4.8)

4 (3.2)

 

 III

2 (4.8)

11 (8.7)

 

 IV

0

1 (0.8)

 

Histologic type, n (%)

 Endometrioid adenocarcinoma

42 (100)

126 (100)

 

 Others

0

0

 

Grade, n (%)

0.576

 G1

25 (59.5)

67 (53.2)

 

 G2

13 (31.0)

50 (39.7)

 

 G3

4 (9.5)

9 (7.1)

 

Myometrial invasion, n (%)

0.611

 < 1/2

37 (88.1)

107 (84.9)

 

  ≥ 1/2

5 (11.9)

19 (15.1)

 

Lymphovascular space invasion, n (%)

1 (2.4)

20 (15.9)

0.022

Uterus weight, g, Mean ± SD

157.1 ± 68.3

149.8 ± 111.8

0.691

Abdominal adhesion, n (%)

21 (50.0)

38 (30.2)

0.020

Postoperative treatment

 CTx, n (%)

4 (9.5)

7 (5.6)

 

  T + C

3 (7.1)

6 (4.8)

 

  Other regimen

1 (2.4)

1 (0.8)

 

  Total cycle, median (range)

5 (4–6)

6 (3–6)

 

 RTx, n (%)

3 (7.1)

24 (19.0)

 

  Vaginal

2 (4.8)

22 (17.5)

 

  Whole pelvis + Vaginal

1 (2.4)

2 (1.6)

 

 CTx + RTx, n (%)

1 (2.4)

7 (5.6)

 
  1. ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; CTx, chemotherapy; RTx, radiation therapy; T + C, Paclitaxel with Carboplatin.