Table 1 Statistical analysis of the distance (mm) at the reference points between groups I, II, III, IV, and the control group.

From: Effectiveness of creating digital twins with different digital dentition models and cone-beam computed tomography

  

#13 gm

#13 cusp

#16 mbc

#23 gm

#23 cusp

#26 mbc

I

Average

0.024

0.029

0.010

− 0.017

0.010

0.000

SD

0.036

0.028

0.017

0.027

0.021

0.012

II

Average

0.217

0.207

0.216

0.208

0.208

0.202

SD

0.035

0.055

0.018

0.037

0.022

0.011

III

Average

− 0.003

0.002

− 0.011

0.016

− 0.004

− 0.009

SD

0.026

0.024

0.016

0.044

0.017

0.010

IV

Average

0.018

− 0.042

− 0.045

− 0.008

− 0.053

− 0.042

SD

0.056

0.021

0.018

0.028

0.060

0.015

F

136.503

196.141

899.840

187.738

210.284

1585.982

p (1)

0.000*

0.000*

0.000*

0.000*

0.000*

0.000*

T (2)

II > I, IV, C, III

II > I, III III > C > IV

II > I, CC > III > IV

II > III, C, IV C, IV > I

II > IV > C, III, I

II > I, C, III > IV

  1. The Fédération Dentaire Internationale two-digit notation system is used to identify teeth.
  2. gm, lowest point of the gingival margin; mbc, mesiobuccal cusp; SD, standard deviation.
  3. (1) Statistical significance was tested using one-way ANOVA among groups (*p < 0.05).
  4. (2) Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Tukey’s test.
Back to article page