Table 4 Comparison of various adsorbents for MB and RO16 removal.
Adsorbent | Adsorbate | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|
Fe-BDC MOF | MB | 8.65 | |
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles | MB | 19.26 | |
g-C3N4 loading on NiCo LDH | MB | 25.16 | |
CNT/eucalyptus derived activated carbon-based | MB | 49.61 | |
MR-Co/Al LDH | MB | 54.01 | |
Zeolite/activated carbon@MnO2 composite | MB | 67.56 | |
Sep-AAM | MB | 99.92 | |
SF@PANI@LDH@RL | MB | 24.813 | Present study |
AC@nZVI/Ni | RO16 | 10.53 | |
Modified zeolites | RO16 | 12.6 | |
Activated carbon prepared from rice husk ash | RO16 | 13.32 | |
MR-Co/Al LDH | RO16 | 53.04 | |
Arachis hypogaea pod powder | RO16 | 56.48 | |
m-Cs-PVA/FA | RO16 | 123.8 | |
SF@PANI@LDH@RL | RO16 | 23.981 | Present study |
