Table 2 Technology comparison of Vivo V9 and Motorola Droid Turbo.
From: Evaluation of in-service smartphone battery drainage profile for video calling feature in major apps
Category | Feature | Vivo V9 | Motorola droid turbo | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Release year | – | 201837 | 201436 | – |
Display | Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED | Owing to the presence of a backlight, IPS LCD consumes more energy than SUPER AMOLED. Furthermore, SUPER AMOLED is more expensive than IPS LCD. When it comes to picture and color contrast, people have ambivalent feelings38,39 |
Size | 99.1 cm2 | 74.5 cm2 | A phone with a larger screen is generally preferred, but it can also consume more energy40,41 | |
Resolution | 1080 × 2280 pixels (400 ppi) | 1440 × 2560 pixels (565 ppi) | A smartphone with a lower resolution display can consume less power than one with a higher resolution display, although at the expense of a slight decrease in display quality42,43 | |
Battery | Type | Lithium polymer | Lithium polymer | The manufacturers did not disclose the chemistry of the lithium-polymer batteries used in both smartphones |
Typical capacity | 3260 mAh37 | 3900 mAh36 | ||
Platform | Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8953-Pro Snapdragon 626 (14 nm) | Qualcomm APQ8084 Snapdragon 805 (28 nm) | The Vivo V9 platform outperforms the Motorola Droid Turbo platform in terms of performance and energy efficiency. Snapdragon 626, on the other hand, is nearly ten times more expensive than Snapdragon 805, owing to technical development44 |
CPU | Octa-core 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 2.7 GHz Krait 450 | ||
GPU | Adreno 506 | Adreno 420 |
