Table 3 Limits of detection (LOD) of the Idylla GeneFusion assay for the detection of ALK, ROS1 and RET specific gene fusions, MET exon 14 skipping as well as unknown gene fusions.

From: Validation of the Idylla GeneFusion assay to detect fusions and MET exon-skipping in non-small cell lung cancers

Commercial standard

Input (ng)

Cq of the RNA controls

Cq of the DNA control

Genomic alterations

Biological interpretation

Cq

∆Cq

SeraSeq

50

32

31.8

Specific alterations

ALK

Detected

31

ROS1

Detected

30.9

RET

Detected

31.6

MET exon 14 skipping

Detected

30.8

Expression imbalance

ALK

Detected

NA

0.2

ROS1

Indeterminate

RET

Indeterminate

NTRK1

Indeterminate

NTRK2

Not detected

31.6

5.8

NTRK3

Detected

NA

–0.3

30

32.3

32.4

Specific alterations

ALK

Detected

31.4

ROS1

Detected

31.2

RET

Detected

31.9

MET exon 14 skipping

Detected

31.1

Expression imbalance

ALK

Detected

NA

0.7

ROS1

Indeterminate

RET

Not detected

NA

5.8

NTRK1

Indeterminate

NTRK2

Not detected

32.3

5.8

NTRK3

Detected

NA

−0.8

15

35.2

34.2

Specific alterations

ALK

Detected

33.1

ROS1

Detected

34.2

RET

Detected

34.9

MET exon 14 skipping

Detected

34.1

Expression imbalance

ALK

Detected

NA

−0.3

ROS1

Indeterminate

RET

Indeterminate

NTRK1

Indeterminate

NTRK2

Indeterminate

NTRK3

Detected

NA

−0.8

7.5

33.2

32

Specific alterations

ALK

Detected

31.9

ROS1

Detected

30.6

RET

Detected

32.7

MET exon 14 skipping

Detected

31.8

Expression imbalance

ALK

Detected

NA

0.3

ROS1

Indeterminate

RET

Indeterminate

NTRK1

Indeterminate

NTRK2

Not detected

32.8

4.3

NTRK3

Detected

NA

−0.6

5

35.6

34.8

Specific alterations

ALK

Detected

34.6

ROS1

Detected

34.8

RET

Not detected

MET exon 14 skipping

Detected

35.1

Expression imbalance

ALK

Detected

NA

0.5

ROS1

Indeterminate

RET

Indeterminate

NTRK1

Indeterminate

NTRK2

Indeterminate

NTRK3

Detected

NA

−0.2

3

not amplified

34.6

Invalid

Horizon

15

34.6

35

Specific alterations

ALK

Detected

34.5

ROS1

Detected

34.6

RET

Detected

32.2

MET exon 14 skipping

Not detected

Expression imbalance

ALK

Detected

NA

0.7

ROS1

Detected

38.5

−5

RET

Detected

36.3

−1.9

NTRK1

Not detected

37.8

−1

NTRK2

Indeterminate

NTRK3

Indeterminate

10

34.9

34.9

Specific alterations

ALK

Detected

35.8

ROS1

Detected

35.3

RET

Detected

32.3

MET exon 14 skipping

Not detected

Expression imbalance

ALK

Detected

NA

1.1

ROS1

Detected

37.5

−3.2

RET

Not detected

36

−1.2

NTRK1

Indeterminate

NTRK2

Indeterminate

NTRK3

indeterminate

7.5

Not amplified

35.7

Invalid

  1. Interpretation of the Idylla results: the Idylla analysis is considered inconclusive if RNA control curves are invalid, and the DNa control Cq is determined to assess RNA degradation; specific fusion is found “detected” if the PCR curve is valid and the Cq appears within a predefined range; MET exon 14 skipping is found “detected” if the corresponding PCR curve is valid, the Cq is within a predefined range and the difference between METex14 and MET wild-type Cq (ΔCq) is below a predefined threshold; the detection of an “expression imbalance” indicates a difference between 3' end and 5' end expression levels of the gene and should reflect the presence of an unknown gene fusion that need to be confirmed by complementary techniques (IHC, FISH or NGS); the analysis of expression imbalance requires the validity of the 3' curve, otherwise the result is qualified as “indetermined”. If the 3′ and 5′ curves are valid, the expression imbalance is considered “detected” if the ΔCq value (i.e. the difference between 3′ and 5′ Cq) is below a predefined (5′ Cq value-dependent) threshold. If the 3′ curve is valid while the 5′ curve is invalid, the ΔCq value is calculated between 3′ and RNA control curves and the expression imbalance is found “detected” if the ΔCq value is below a predefined threshold
  2. Cq cycle quantification, NA not applicable.