Table 1 The physicochemical properties of soil at the experimental site, Egypt during the growing seasons of 2019 and 2020.

From: Impact of different sowing dates and irrigation levels on NPK absorption, yield and water use efficiency of maize

Parameter

Unit

Value

Analytical method used

0–30

30–60

Mechanical analysis

 Sand

%

92.95

93.88

International pipette method Estefan et al.33

 Silt

%

3.75

4.06

 Clay

%

3.30

2.06

 Texture

Sand

Soil Survey Staff32

 

Chemical analysis

 pH (1:5)

 

7.90

7.8

Systronics 372 electrode pH meter in 1: 5 soil–water suspension Janke et al.31

 Electrical conductivity (EC) 1:5 at 25 °C

ds m−1

0.60

0.39

Systronics 372 electrode EC/ TDS/Salinity meter in 1: 5 soil–water suspension Janke et al.31

 CaCO3

%

8.30

6.0

Titration method Estefan et al.33

 Available Nitrogen (N)

mg kg−1

13.0

20.0

Kjeldahl's method Estefan et al.33

 Available Phosphorus (P)

mg kg−1

6.5

6.0

Spectrophotometer at 410-nm wave length Estefan et al.33

 Available Potassium (K)

meq l−1

0.3

0.2

Flame Photometer Estefan et al.33

 Magnesium cations (Mg)

meq l−1

0.6

1.0

EDTA-disodium salt solution

 Sodium cations (Na)

meq l−1

1.0

1.1

Flame Photometer Estefan et al.33

 Calcium cations (Ca)

meq l−1

1.6

1.0

Titration method Estefan et al.33

 Chloride anions (Cl)

meq l−1

1.2

1.0

Mohrs’s titration Estefan et al.33

 Bicarbonate anions (HCO3)

meq l−1

0.3

0.2

Titration method Estefan et al.33

 Sulfate anions (SO4)

meq l−1

1.8

2.0

Barium sulfate (BaSO4) precipitation Estefan et al.33

 Organic matter

%

0.01

0.1

Walkley–Black method Estefan et al.33

Water status

 Saturation percent

%

22.0

27.0

Gravimetric method Vaz et al.42

 Field capacity

%

11.9

13.8

 Wilting point

%

4.9

4.8

  1. Each value represents the mean of three replications.