Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-33863-z, published online 09 May 2023

The original version of this Article contained errors in Table 2, where values were missing under the column “WSIs”. The correct and incorrect columns appear below.

Incorrect:

All included

Training and validation set

Number of cases

WSIs

Number of Cases

WSIs

479

1832

369

1435

4

744*

2

593

475

1087

367

842

4

744

2

593

219

 

178

 

256

 

189

 

4

744

2

594

81

 

63

177

138

 

115

226

138

 

98

215

118

 

91

223

Correct:

All included

Training and validation set

Number of cases

WSIs

Number of cases

WSIs

479

1832

369

1435

4

745*

2

594

475

1087

367

841

4

745

2

594

219

506

178

403

256

581

189

438

4

745

2

594

81

230

63

177

138

276

115

226

138

294

98

215

118

287

91

223

The original Article has been corrected.