Table 3 The OR (95%CI) of UC across quartile categories of PRAL.

From: Association between dietary acid load and the odds of ulcerative colitis: a case–control study

 

Dietary potential renal acid load

Q1(n = 47)

Q2 (n = 46)

P-value

Q3 (n = 47)

P-Value

Q4 (n = 46)

P-valuea

Cases/controls

11/36

18/28

 

13/34

 

20/26

 

Range of PRAL mEq/day

− 59.49 to − 9.87

− 9.45 to − 0.28

 

− 0.08 to 7.79

 

7.80 to 41.51

 

Model 1*

1.00 (Ref)

2.10 (0.85–5.16)

0.10

1.25 (0.49–3.17)

0.63

2.51 (1.03–6.14)

0.043

Model 2

1.00 (Ref)

2.18 (0.88–5.41)

0.09

1.29 (0.50–3.32)

0.59

2.99 (1.16–7.72)

0.023

Model 3

1.00 (Ref)

2.41 (0.85–6.86)

0.09

1.70 (0.57–5.11)

0.33

3.08 (1.01–9.39)

0.048

  1. Significant values are in bold.
  2. aMultivariable logistic regression test.
  3. *Crude model.
  4. Adjusted for age and gender.
  5. Additionally adjusted for body mass index, current smoking, education, Helicobacter pylori infection, total energy intake, omega-3 fatty acids, trans-fatty acids, and total dietary fiber.
  6. PRAL potential renal acid load.