Table 6 Model comparisons for measurement invariance testing across sex, age, and clinical status.

From: Psychometric assessment of the 10-item, revised experience of close relationship (ECR-R-10) in nonclinical and clinical populations of adults and older adults in Thailand

Model

χ2(df)

Δχ2(Ī”df)

CFI

TLI

SRMR

RMSEA

ΔCFI

ΔTLI

ΔRMSEA

Invariance across sex groups

Ā Model 1

317.514 (68)

Ā 

0.933

0.911

0.051

0.085

Ā Ā Ā 

Ā Model 2

328.447(76)

10.933(8), p = 0.205

0.932

0.919

0.054

0.081

0.001

0.008

0.004

Ā Model 3

338.969(84)

10.521(8), p = .1617

0.931

0.926

0.038

0.055

0.001

0.007

0.026

Invariance across age groups

Ā Model 1

148.424 (56)

Ā 

0.948

0.916

0.076

0.090

Ā Ā Ā 

Ā Model 2

150.739(64)

2.314(8), p = 0.9698

0.951

0.931

0.079

0.081

0.003

0.015

0.009

Ā Model 3

161.902(72)

10.521(8), p = .1926

0.949

0.936

0.084

0.078

0.002

0.005

0.003

Invariance across clinical status groups

Ā Model 1

184.282(56)

Ā 

0.971

.953

.048

.067

Ā Ā Ā 

Ā Model 2

196.297(64)

12.015(8), p = 0.15

0.970

.958

.053

.064

0.001

0.003

0.003

Ā Model 3

260.461(72)

64.163(8), p < .001

0.957

.947

.061

.071

0.013

0.011

0.007

Invariance across four groups (adult nonclinical, adult clinical, older adults nonclinical, and older adult clinical samples)

Ā Model 1

247.066(112)

Ā 

0.970

.952

.054

.069

Ā Ā Ā 

Ā Model 2

274.431(136)

27.365(24), p = 0.2877

0.969

.959

.062

.063

0.001

0.007

0.006

Ā Model 3

397.984(160)

123.553(24), p < .001

0.947

.941

.073

.076

0.022

0.018

0.013

  1. Model 1, configural invariance; Model 2, metric invariance; Model 3, scalar invariance; Model 4, residual invariance. χ2, chi-squared test; df, degrees of freedom; CFI, comparative fit index; TLI, Tucker-Lewis index; SRMR, standardized root mean square residual; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation.