Table 3 Post-hoc comparisons for analysis of variance on impact scores (n = 509).

From: Positive and negative psychosocial impacts on cancer survivors

 

Positive sub-domains

Negative sub-domains

SC

SI

SR

Sp

SC

SI

SR

Sp

Age

1 > 3*

1 > 2 > 3

1,2 > 3

1,2 > 3

2 > 3

1 > 3

1 > 3

 

Gender

2 > 1

2 > 1

2 > 1

2 > 1

    

Ethnic

        

Relation

        

Education

 

2 > 1

      

Income

     

1 > 4

1 > 2

 
  1. *1 > 3 represents category 1 had higher impacts than category 3.
  2. All showed post-hoc comparisons are statistically significant with a p-value < 0.05.
  3. Age: (1) < 50, (2) 50–65, (3) 65 + 
  4. Gender: (1) M, (2) F .
  5. Ethnic group: (1) not white, (2) white .
  6. Relationship: (1) with significant other, (2) no significant other .
  7. Education: (1) ≦high school, (2) ≧some college.
  8. Income: (1) < 20 K, (2) 20-50 K, (3) 50-100 K, (4) > 100 K.
  9. SC, self-concept; SI, social impact; SR, stress response; Sp, spirituality.
Back to article page