Table 5 Performance of Xpert monitor to predict the need for 2nd TURB.

From: Xpert bladder cancer monitor to predict the need for a second TURB (MoniTURB trial)

Group

n

TP

FP

TN

FN

Sensitivity

Specificity

HG

LG

PPV

NPV

(a) Total cohort (n = 171)

 Control cystoscopy

56

2

18

36

0

2/2 (100%)

36/54 (66.7%)

 

2/2 (100%)

2/20 (10%)

36/36 (100%)

 2nd TURB

112

28

44

34

6

28/34 (82.4%)

34/78 (43.6%)

24/28 (85.7%)

4/6 (66.7%)

28/72 (38.9%)

34/40 (85.0%)

 Total

168

30

62

70

6

30/36 (83.3%)

70/132 (53.0%)

24/28 (85.7%)

6/8 (75%)

30/92 (32.6%)

70/76 (92.1%)

(b) Patients with muscle in specimen at initial TURB (n = 131)

 Control cystoscopy

36

1

15

20

0

1/1 (100%)

20/35 (57.1%)

 

1/1 (100%)

1/16 (6.3%)

20/20 (100%)

 2nd TURB

93

24

37

28

4

24/28 (85.7%)

28/65 (43.1%)

20/24 (83.3%)

4/4 (100%)

24/61 (39.3%)

28/32 (87.5%)

 Total

129

25

52

48

4

25/29 (86.2%)

48/100 (48%)

20/24 (83.3%)

5/5 (100%)

25/77 (32.5%)

48/52 (92.3%)

(c) Patients with pTa tumor at initial TURB (n = 115)

 Control cystoscopy

54

2

16

36

0

2/2 (100%)

36/52 (69.2%)

 

2/2 (100%)

2/18 (11.1%)

36/36 (100%)

 Second TURB

59

14

25

19

1

14/15 (93.3%)

19/44 (43.2%)

11/11 (100%)

3/4 (66.7%)

14/39 (35.9%)

19/20 (95.0%)

 Total

113

16

41

55

1

16/17 (83.3%)

55/96 (57.3%)

11/11 (100%)

5/6 (83.3%)

16/57 (28.1%)

55/56 (98.2%)

  1. TP, true positive; FP, false positive; TN, true negative; FN, false negative; HG, sensitivity for high-grade; LG, sensitivity for low-grade; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.